🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized version promoted by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was in essence a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• The shortlist included several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder interpretation led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. Its omission of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.