🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.